Bangladesh is
addicted to revolution. It has happened time and again, and despite its
uneven achievement record at best, it continues to attract people and
individuals who feel that salvation lies in dramatic decisions which
ultimately peter out, creating the platform for the next revolution.

Many consider the 1971 war as the first
revolution, and in the years after independence as the situation
crumbled and the suffering of people increased, the call for another
revolution began to surface.
If the various shades of leftists were
calling for one revolution or another, the party in power, the Awami
League, and its supporters began to talk of the "second revolution" as
the solution to the problems of politics and governance that the country
faced. This was, in essence, the populist aspect of Baksal, or
one-party rule, as it contained the smell of revolution which till then
was the most acceptable symbol of political change.
If 1971 was the first revolution, all
subsequent "shocks" could also be packaged as "revolution." It was a
faith in the description, and perhaps in the process, rather than
substance that drove many to believe that as long as it was
revolutionary or sudden and dramatic, and even traumatic, things would
end in victory.
No comments:
Post a Comment